A monopoly is where a company or individual has a share in a
particular product, medium or argument. Rupert Murdoch has a large monopoly of
many companies in the media; under News International are the newspapers: the
Sun and the Times, along with over 800 other smaller companies around the world
including Fox, Sky and HarperCollins.
It is important that no single media producer in the UK has
a monopoly because all media would be bias and almost fascist in that certain
news/opinions could be censored or endorsed to manipulate peoples own interests
or concerns to uniform.
Consumer choice is important as it allows individuals to opt
for services which they think best suits them. People choose specific
newspapers published by different companies because it expresses the political
views they believe in, people choose certain TV packages from different
companies because the programming is best suited to them; a younger person may
choose packages with ITV 2, MTV and similar, an older person may prefer Sky
Arts, ITV 3 or similar. If there was no consumer choice then everything would
be the same, specific to what one company or government believes people should
be allowed to know or see.
Censorship is the restrictions put in place to avoid
perverting people’s interests. In pre-recorded broadcast media, censorship can
occur in words or conversations being edited out. In many countries, censorship
is more restrictive than others; for example in China, all references to
politics is prohibited (not just in the media) – websites, TV shows and movies
from outside countries are all either edited or banned before being released in
China.
There is a fine line between censorship and protecting
public interest because censorship is put in place to protect public interest
only by non-restricting companies or governments: when a James Bond film was
shown on British Airways, a scene involving a Virgin plane was cut from the
movie – it was not to protect the public interest but to shun a rival company.
In restrictive governments, like Russia or China; censorship is used broadly to
protect the public from what that government thinks they should be censored
from; not necessarily what they believe is dangerous (like references to
Homosexuality) but anything which degrades their country’s leaders or could
influence a revolt against them.
Under18s should be subject to particular consideration by
regulators as the majority are easily influenced by the media. If there was no
censorship for under 18s, then they could be subject to violence or ‘foul’ language which could
traumatise them. Agreed, the system is flawed and many believe that it should
be changed, but there should be a system in place to censor under 18s.